Man has come so far. 5 million years ago we broke off from
our cousins the apes and showed no sign of turning back. Steadily we have
evolved, discovering the temporary limits of knowledge and physical feats of
the human imagination. From building the pyramids, to understanding relativity,
to creating iPods, intelligence has allowed us to create a world which would be
surreal to our ancestors.
The importance of cultivating intelligence is pretty clear,
and therefore we have put into place a system which is meant to teach
intelligence to the youngest members of society in hope that they will be able
to carry on the torch of innovation and test the boundaries of life. Recently
however, there’s been a lot of controversy surrounding the effectiveness or
necessity of traditional schooling in producing innovative minds at the highest
level. Everyone from Suli Breaks, the spoken word poet behind the “Why I Love Education but Hate School” YouTube hit, to the highly esteemed Jacque Fresco
have questioned the viability of the current institutions as they stand today.
To some extent I can’t help but disagree with them, as most
conventionally successful people have been through the traditional system as we
know it and achieved great things. That statistics are overwhelming. Nevertheless, the one peripheral question which arose in my mind was this: has intelligence been the only thing in helping
us get here?
Here’s
the problem: where’s the room for innate animal instincts? After all, that’s
all we are, glorified apes who broke away from the family. Bearing in mind this
is simply an observational response to my own thoughts, I am inclined to wonder
if there’s a fine and delicate balance between brutal animal instincts and
evolutionary intelligence. Some of the greatest thought leaders of humanity
have not only been intelligent thinkers, but have embodied certain qualities such
as competitiveness, ambition, and unwavering and unshakeable commitment to
their goals. They laughed in the face of fear and failure, and simply strived
to make their unfathomable dreams something which have become social norms for
us everyday. From Martin Luther King to Richard Branson, many men have risked
everything which was normal for them, including their own lives in order to
pursue a higher goal. Now how many of us can truly say we would stand by a goal
even if it meant the death of us?
Accepting death for a goal which others may not understand,
and being able to pursue that goal relentlessly, are both characteristics which
are likened to the warrior instinct at the rawest level. We all know the tales
of the Japanese Samurai and how they would rather die or commit seppuku than
lose a battle. At first glance, to someone who believes themselves to be
intelligent, this would seem extremely foolish and downright pointless. I mean,
you live to fight another day, right?
In a recent article for Time magazine, Jeffery Kluger spoke
about how many serial killers have an imbalance of genetics which causes them
to act aggressively and embark upon paths of terror and destruction. Colloquially,
this imbalance is known as the “Warrior Gene”. It’s this sort of terminology
and connotation which we award to the word ‘warrior’, which has led us to shun
these primal instincts as crude and uncivilised in the increasingly sanitised
world we live in.
But what is warrior instinct? Is it not simply the ability
to execute the task you’ve been trained to do at the right time without fearing
for death or any other obstacle? It’s
the ability that you can still carry out your duty under pressure, something
which is probably innate in all human beings, but has been steadily been weaned
out of us under the veil of civilisation. If we take a look at our closest
cousins, the chimpanzee-who share about 99% of our DNA- on average, they are
stronger, faster and do better under stress than humans do, and often risk life
and limb to prove a point however small it may be. Perhaps it’s a sign of
evolution, or maybe it’s a sign of devolution.
Nowadays, this sort of stubborn courage is likened mainly to fighters, or the modern day warriors. Many fighters will avidly state that they
will risk their life to prove they are the best. Unfortunately, the way it’s
portrayed in the media, is quite negative and typically cage fighters have a
rep for being brutal animals and therefore inherently, the qualities they so
avidly embody, are slapped with negative stigmatisms. But the focus here is
that the fighter is already putting his body on the line in order to achieve an
often very personal goal and therefore it seems absurd that this goal is worth
risking life and limb for. But let’s take a second and view someone who is
truly great in their own arena. Perhaps some of you thought of Gandhi, Martin
Luther King, or even Beyoncé. The first two already gave their lives for their
causes. Granted, they had causes which were somewhat universal, but it does not
take away from the fact that they were willing to put everything on the line to
achieve the goal. Even if we took Beyoncé for example, there are countless
stories of her simply disregarding her own health and well being in order to
achieve a certain goal. I’m sure if we took a poll of the best athletes,
academics, musicians and people, we would find that the vast majority would
embody all these characteristics even insofar as death, in order to fulfil
their goals. Will Smith once famously said, “I’m not afraid to die on a
treadmill. You will not outwork me, period!”
Now don't get me wrong, i'm not saying to be great you have to die, but its simply the clearest and crudest example which i can offer in this instance.
To put it into perspective, don’t all people who achieve great things, work well under pressure and execute their knowledge when it’s necessary? Whether you are an academic or a professional fighter, the common factor is the drive to be better against all odds.
To put it into perspective, don’t all people who achieve great things, work well under pressure and execute their knowledge when it’s necessary? Whether you are an academic or a professional fighter, the common factor is the drive to be better against all odds.
Therefore the question remains: by downplaying such instincts
within our nature, are we limiting the process of evolution? In a world where
everything is convenient and you pretty much have everything at the touch of a
button, are we at risk of losing what brought us this far in the first place.
Is there still a place for the struggle and strife of a human?
Intelligence is one thing which each and every human has been
blessed with. It’s how you use it and apply it which has brought us this far.
But in my opinion, we cannot ignore the raw instincts so many great people past
and present embody which have aligned so perfectly with their intelligence and
allowed them to make a dream a reality, or turn a simple thought into a
tangible object.
In that respect I agree with Fresco and Suli Breaks that perhaps
the school system does have an inherent problem insofar as the mechanisms it
uses to educate children. Perhaps these same mechanisms have the ability to wean
out certain characteristics gradually over time and teach you and I how to
follow instructions instead of questioning and believing.
This isn’t supposed to convince you that we are worse off than
we were 100 years ago as that would obviously be foolhardy and ignorant, nor is
it meant to slander the current school system in any way, it’s simply an attempt
to get you to question what your own delicate balance is. Have the heart of a lion, and live your life as a champion.
By Viren Samani
(@VirenSamani1)
Hey man just wanted to say that I have been reading lots of Nietzsche, and contrary to the many negative illusions he has cast around him, he is very much along the same lines as this. I also was starting to come to the same conclusions as you and him, in the respect that our education system treats kids like blank slates who are supposed to be written on by teachers. The problem I have found with my education is that I had to fight to think! And by that I mean i was put in classrooms where you were on the whole told to remember rather than inquire. The system from an early age works to standardise rather than diversify our individual talents and personal interests, it squashes our child like curiosity as we get older and older, and when we have no clue what to do next we are then blasted by those in authority as un creative or mediocre. I don't believe that life should be an endless struggle against all odds and poverty etc, but every individual must be made to face the self, and ask themselves the ultimate question, what am I doing here on this planet, as well as what can I do that I would want to remember and be remembered for? and what was it that I loved when I was a child, in that beautiful timeless trance that is the most pleasant dream? Basically the one subject they need is philosophy... But oh no wait it is the one subject they do not do... I wonder why? Hmm maybe it is to stop us thinking too much!!!?!
ReplyDeleteAlso, just wanted to say thanks for your great articles, I hope you are advertising these they are seriously very good!
Delete